Building aspherical manifolds.
January 25, 2007 7:17 PM talks mathematics
I gave a Farb student seminar talk on a lovely paper, > MR0690848 I also used some of the material in > MR1937019 which summarizes other the many applications of the "reflection group trick," and works through some examples with cubical complexes. The main result is
Theorem. Suppose Bπ=K(π,1) is a finite complex. Then there is a closed aspherical manifold Mn and a retraction π1(M)→π.
This manifold M can be explictly constructed by gluing together copies of the regular neighorhood of Bπ embedded in some Euclidean space. The application of this theorem is to "promote" a finite complex to a closed aspherical manifold. For instance, we have a finite complex with non-residually-finite fundamental group: define the group π=⟨a,b:ab2a−1=b3⟩, which is not residually finite, and observe that the presentation 2-complex is aspherical, so we have a finite Bπ. Then using the theorem to "promote" this to a closed aspherical manifold, we get a manifold Mn with fundamental group retracting onto π. But a group retracting onto a non-residually-finite group is also non-residually finite, so we have found a closed aspherical manifold Mn with non-residually-finite fundamental group. Just to whet your appetite, let me introduce a few of the main players, so as to give a sense of how to glue together copies of the regular neighborhood of Bπ. Let L be a simplicial complex, and V=L(0), the vertices of L. From L we construct two things: some complexes to glue together, and some groups with which to do the gluing. First, we construct the groups. Define J to be the group (Z/2Z)V, i.e., the abelian group generated by v∈V with v2=1. Next define WL to be the right-angled Coxeter group having L(1) as its Coxeter diagram; specifically, WL is the group with generators v∈V and relations v2=1 for v∈V and also the relations vivj=vjvi if the edge (vi,vj) is in L. Note that J is the abelianization of WL. Next we will build the complexes to be glued together with the above groups. Let K be the cone on the barycentric subdivision of L, and define closed subspaces {Kv}v∈V by setting Kv to be the closed star of the vertex v in the subdivision of L. Note that Kv are subcomplexes of the boundary of K, and that a picture would be worth a thousand words right now. Having the complexes and the groups, we will glue together copies of K along the Kv's, thinking of the latter as the mirrors. Specifically, define PL=(J×K)/∼ with (g,x)∼(h,y) provided that x=y and g−1h∈Jσ(x), where σ(x)={v∈V:x∈Kv}, and Jσ(x) is the subgroup of J generated by σ(x). That is a mouthful, but it really is just carefully taking a copy K for each group element of J and gluing along the Kv's in the appropriate manner. The resulting compplex PL has a J action with fundamental domain K. Similarly, we use WL to define a complex ΣL=(WL×K)/∼. The topology of ΣL is related to the complex L that we started with. For example, if L is the triangulation of Sn−1, then ΣL is a manifold. Similarly, if L is a flag complex, then ΣL is contractible. The idea, now, is to take some finite complex Bπ, embed it in RN, and take a regular neighborhood; the result is a manifold X with boundary ∂X, and with π1X=π. Triangulate ∂X as a flag complex, and call the resulting complex L. Instead of gluing together copies of K, glue together copies of X along the subdivision of L to get PL(X)=(J×X)/∼ and ΣL(X)=(WL×X)/∼. With some work, we check that ΣL(X) is contractible because L is flag, and that the contractible space ΣL(X) covers the closed manifold PL(X), which is therefore aspherical. Since PL(X)→X→PL(X) is a retraction of spaces, we have found our desired aspherical manifold M=PL(X) with a retraction of fundamental groups.